Falling Leaf IPA Tasting Notes

December 2, 2013 at 9:58 pm

Falling-Leaf-IPA-TW

 

Falling Leaf IPA Tasting Notes:

Appearance: Pours a hazy, dark gold with burt orange overtones. A puffy cloud like whitish-tan head sits atop.

Smell: Sharp, cutting citrus,pine and sweet malt.

Taste:  Starts smooth and malty, lazily giving way to a moderate bitterness that transitions nicely to a finish of aromatic, bright, floral hops.

Mouthfeel: Slightly under carbonated, malty with a moderately bitter finish.

Drinkability & Notes: While this finished lighter then what I would consider the average IPA it has a wonderful malt flavor that is extremely clean and supports the heaping amount of late addition hops.  It has a moderate hop bitterness as opposed to the over the top bitterness in many of the commercial examples with huge hop aromatics and flavors on the finish.

For me the highlight of this beer is the finish.  The finish is loaded with amazing hop flavors yet just enough bitterness to cut through the malt  The Simcoe really dominates with its pine and grapefruit flavors while the Citra and Amarillo play  off them nicely with their citrus and floral contributions.

I brought a half keg to a Thanksgiving party a few weeks ago and it was a huge hit with all everyone.  The keg wound up going super fast and made me wish that I had brought a full keg instead of a half.  At the party I  was describing the beer as more of a strong Pale Ale then an IPA but a lot of people thought it was perfectly in the range of and IPA style beer.  Either way, what it lacks in bitterness it more than makes up with its hoppy finish, making this truly enjoyably and accessible, hoppy beer.

 Falling-Leaf-IPA-web

 

Falling Leaf IPA

October 31, 2013 at 8:51 pm

After spending the past few months preparing for and brewing for my wedding I can say that it was worth all the effort. The beers were a huge hit, our guests drank close to 20 cases of beer and almost all the homebrew,  more importantly I am now a happily married man.  The biggest hit without a doubt was the Rich’s Pale Ale, with one keg kicking during the cocktail hour alone.  With the wedding now behind me I can focus my energy back on the small things in life such as this blog and  brewing more experimental beers.

Several weeks ago I placed an order with HopsDirect for some  their 2013 hop harvest, my order including some Citra and Cascade in addition to a few English varieties.  I decided that an IPA was in order to utilize some of these fresh hops as well as use up some of last years crop that Ive been working though this year.

I wanted to keep the grain bill fairly simple to let the hops shine, in fact I think this maybe the least amount of specialty grains I have ever used in a batch, except for my Tripel.  I went with a base of American 2-Row with a bit of Caraamber malt.  I was reading through last months issue of BYO on the plane ride back from my honeymoon and noticed that Hill Farmstead, used a grain bill consisting entirely of 2-Row and Caraamber malts for one of their beers.  I thought if it works for one of the most popular, critically acclaimed brewers in the world, that I should give it a try too.

The main attraction in this one is the hops obviously, being an IPA and all I decided to break out all of the big guns. Simcoe, Amarillo, Citra, and Cascade make up the aroma additions with a touch of Belma for bittering.  The Simcoe and Amarillo combo served as the basis for my Pale Ale and work wonderfully together.  I’m hoping that the addition of the fresh Citra and Cascade will give this one an even more over-the-top citrus hop punch.  I plan on dry hopping with the Citra and Cascade combo to round this one out, which I am hopeful will rival the amazing Simcoe Amarillo hop pairing I’ve had great success dry hopping with in the past.

Falling Leaf IPA

Batch Size: 10.5 Gallons

Original Gravity: 1.066
Est. Final Gravity: 1.014
ABV: 6.9%
IBU: 65.2
Color: 6.7 SRM
Boil Time: 60 Min

94.1%  2-Row
5.9% Caraamber

.75 Oz Belma (11.3% AA) at 60 min
.75 Oz Amarillo (9.2% AA) at 20 min
.75 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 20 min
.75 Oz Citra (12.9% AA) at 20 min
1 Tbsp Irish Moss at 15 min
.75 Oz Cascade (8.5% AA) at 15 min
.75 Oz Amarillo (9.2% AA) at 10 min
.75 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 10 min
.75 Oz Citra (12.9% AA) at 10 min
.75 Oz Cascade (8.5% AA) at 5 min
.75 Oz Amarillo (9.2% AA) at 0 min
.75 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 0 min
.75 Oz Citra (12.9% AA) at 0 min

2 Packages US-05 SafeAle

Dry Hop:

1.5 Oz Citra (12.9% AA) 7 Days
1.5 Oz Cascade (8.5% AA) 7 Days

Mash:
60 minutes at 152F (Saccharification Rest)

Hops Close Up

Timber Ridge Double IPA Tasting Notes

June 29, 2013 at 8:21 pm

Timber Ridge Double IPA

 

Timber Ridge Double IPA Tasting Notes:

Appearance: Pours deep burnt orange bordering on a brown, golden yellow and orange highlights when held to the light.  Crystal clear with two finger pillowy white head, that quickly dissipates giving way to long lasting lacing.

Smell: Ripe fruit, citrus, strong lemon, grapefruit and orange aromatics present.  sweet malt.

Taste: Starts smooth, overly aggressive bitterness characterizing many Double IPA’s is noticeably absent.  Nice blend of herbal grassy notes and citrus throughout.Finishes sweet with big citrus aftertaste.

Mouthfeel: Smooth, semi-sweet.  Moderately carbonated, mild alcohol bite on the finish.

Drinkability & Notes:   For being such a strong beer (9.2%) this is extremely drinkable.  The dextrose did its job and took this beer a down a couple of extra gravity points, to the sweet spot for this style.  With that being said there is something that is off with this beer, something subtle that I cant quite place that tempers my enthusiasm for it.  After giving it some thought I have narrowed it down to two possible things.

The first and most likely in my opinion is the use of large quantities of Belma hops.  The Belma hops contribute some nice lemon notes, but also a harsher almost vegetal flavor that throws off the balance of the hop flavors.  It is a truly unique flavor, one that I could do with out, and one that I am also struggling to describe.  One reason Im leaning this way is that I did a dry hop with Belma hops when I first got them and remember the same slightly off putting taste.  The second possible cause of the off flavor is that I pitched this batch directly on a Burton Ale yeast cake, most likely drastically overpitching.  I don’t usually do this and have read that it is possible to pick up certain off flavors from pitching directly onto an unwashed yeast cake.

All in all its not a bad beer, it tastes great on a hot summer day and gets you toasty in a hurry.  If I were to brew this beer again I would drop the Belma hops altogether and substitute a traditional American hop such as Cascade or Cenntennial.  I would also make sure to pitch on either a washed yeast cake or a fresh pitch of Burton Ale yeast.

 

photo (6)

Rich’s Coffee Pale Ale 2.0 Tasting Notes

May 24, 2013 at 9:33 pm

I will admit it, I am a coffee addict.  I absolutely love coffee and enjoy each and every cup I drink throughout the day.  I have also been known to enjoy a coffee porter or two from time to time, however with that being said I have never experimented coffee in any of my homebrews.  Traditionally coffee finds its way into darker beers usually porters and stouts as the darker malts used in them tend to compliment the roasty, coffee notes.  Recently, I have been reading about brewers experimenting with coffee in other non traditional beers such as IPAs.  I decided that I would experiment with a small batch of my Pale Ale and attempt to infuse it with some coffee flavors.

After doing some research online it appears that the two most common ways to extract the good coffee flavors without the bad (astringent) is by one of the following methods.  Cold brew.  This process calls for grinding up the appropriate amount of coffee and placing it in cold water for 24 hours, after which the coffee is seperated and the coffee is added to the beer usually before bottling or kegging.  The second option, is to do a coffee bean dry hop where whole coffee beans are crushed slightly and added to the secondary or keg directly.  When brewing a porter or a stout option one is available, however when attempting to add coffee to a pale ale, realistically the coffee bean dry hop is the only option in order to preserve the classic Pale Ale color profile.

Below are my tasting notes after adding 22 grams of slightly crushed Columbian finca villa loyola coffee beans and 1 oz of whole leaf Chinook Hops to a 2.5 gallon keg.  The coffee beans were left in the dry hop for two days prior to being removed, the hops were left for the full 7 days.

Rich’s Coffee Pale Ale 2.0(WLP023) Tasting Notes:

Appearance: Pours a deep orange with shades of brown.  A one finger slightly off white head dissipates slowly leaving the glass rimmed with lacing. (No discernible visual difference between this and the regular Rich’s Pale Ale.)

Smell: Mild cocoa, fresh flowers, orange and lemon notes are complimented by a sweet malt and fruit.

Taste: Smooth clean sweetness  serves as a basis for the coffee notes which cut right through immediately as the beer hits the palate.  Mild and restrained, but definitely noticeable the flavors work wonderfully with the fruitiness of the Burton Ale Yeast.  Much less bitter than the SafeAle-05 batch which allows the interplay between the citrus and floral hop aromatics and the coffee to take center stage.

Mouthfeel: Moderately carbonated, nice interplay of hop aromatics and malt sweetness with a slight edge towards the hops.

Drinkability & Notes: This beer is absolutely fantastic, and has to be one of my favorite beers brewed ever!  Im having a hard time believing that something as simple as adding a few grams of coffee to a dry hop could have such an amazing impact on the final beer.  The coffee flavors meld beautifully with the malt sweetness and the subtle citrus and floral hop aromatics.  The fruitiness of the Burton Ale yeast puts this beer over the top for me as pulls all the flavors together into one absolutely delicious sip.  I will definitely be experimenting with additional coffee bean dry hops in the future, and am considering brewing 10 gallons of the Coffee Pale Ale for my wedding as I believe that the flavors of this beer will be enjoyed by a wide audience, not just the beer connoisseurs.

Coffee Pale Ale

Rich’s Pale Ale 2.0 Tasting Notes

May 20, 2013 at 8:36 pm

Richs-Pale-2.0

Rich’s Pale Ale 2.0(US-05) Tasting Notes:

Appearance: Pours a deep orange with shades of brown.  A one finger slightly off white head dissipates slowly leaving the glass rimmed with lacing.

Smell: Strong orange and grapefruit, piney and resinous, subtle floral notes accompany a slight malt sweetness.

Taste: Smooth clean sweetness with a mild hop bite on the initial sip, complemented nicely by a moderate hop medley of citrus and pine.  Finishes with a hint of herbs and orange, a lingering bitterness and hints of carmel round out the flavor profile.

Mouthfeel: Moderately carbonated, feels somewhat thin, nice interplay of hop aromatics and malt sweetness with a slight edge towards the hops.

Drinkability & Notes: This being the second version of my pale ale I was able to tweak the recipe, specifically in the addition of a touch more crystal malt in hopes of achieving a better balance.  This version is definitely more balanced than the first and the hop aromas align closer to those found in some of the popular commercial examples of the style.  In the first recipe I used CTZ and Summit which were a bit too aggressive in both bitterness and aroma and pushed the beer towards the upper limits of the Pale Ale range. These tasting notes are from the SafeAle-05 fermented batch, which is evident by the extremely clean fermentation. There are no noticeable yeast flavors, however upon tasting the gravity samples there was a noticeable difference in the bitterness between the US-05 and the Burton Ale WLP23 versions, with the US-05 being much more bitter.  I will provide tasting notes for the WLP23 fermented batch in the near future, which I suspect will be a bit more complex.

Unfortunately, I had brew day problems that forced me to completely drain my mash tun mid mash (never switch dip tubes in a rush) and subsequently caused my mash temperature to drop into the 130 degree range.  As a result this beer finished slightly higher in alcohol than anticipated as well as slightly thinner.  The additional 2-4 gravity points that would have resulted from a proper mash temperature would have really set this beer off, as I prefer my Pale Ale’s to have a slightly maltier mouthfeel.  With that being said I believe this recipe is much more balanced than the first, with a great blend of malt and citrus/pine hops aromatics, and based on the reactions from my friends and family will be a contender for first kegs to kick at my wedding later this year. 

photo-3

Timber Ridge Double IPA

May 13, 2013 at 7:54 pm

I’ll preface this post by saying I’m not the biggest hophead out there, in fact I tend to migrate more towards big malty beers when I’m looking for a high alcohol punch.  However, this year I was able to get my hands on several pounds of the popular citrusy/pine hops, namely Simcoe, Amarillo, and Citra, that are mainstays in many of the big commercial IPA’s and double IPA’s.  Additionally, as I continue down my “beers to brew” checklist, I decided that now was as good a time as any to give a double IPA a shot.

When brewing a double IPA there are several things to consider in the recipe formulation, the first and most obvious is the hop schedule and varieties.  For this recipe I went with three hops, specifically Belma, Simcoe, and Amarillo.  Belma is a new hop this year offered exclusively from HopsDirect.  On the site it is described as “a clean hop, imparting flavors of orange, grapefruit, tropical, pineapple, strawberry and melon.” However, after reading reviews of fellow brewers it seems like the hop falls somewhat short in the aroma intensity department, described by many as a “mild aroma” and another as a “cheaper Magnum”.

For that reason, coupled with the extremely low price of $5 a lb I decided to use the Belma for my main bittering additions.  I used a First Wort Hop to produce a smoother bitterness as well as additions at 20 and 15 to hopefully catch some of the flavors described previously.  I finished out the hop bill with additions of Amarillo and Simcoe at 10 and 5 minutes respectively as well as a huge 6 oz hop addition during my whirlpool.  These additions should contribute the classic citrus/pine aromatics that define American double IPA’s.  It is important to note that I added the hops to the wort upon chilling to 165 degrees, as at this temperature a greater percentage of the hop compounds are transfered to the wort, delivering an aromatic hop punch to the final beer.

Another important aspect of the recipe is the corn sugar addition.  This will dry out the beer somewhat while contributing to the overall alcohol strength that defines the style.  A double IPA shouldn’t be a malt monster, the dextrose provides the extra fuel for the yeast to get you to the sweet spot of around 1.016-1.104 FG. Lastly, one needs to consider the amount of wort that will be lost to the hops during the brewing process.  I calculated a loss of roughly a tenth of a gallon per oz of hops added during the brew.  In the recipe below I calculated my numbers for a 7 gallon batch with 10 oz of hops, and wound up with just over 6 gallons into my carboy on completion of the brew day.

Timber Ridge Double IPA

Batch Size: 7 Gallons

Original Gravity: 1.084
Est. Final Gravity: 1.016
ABV: 9.1%
IBU: 106.3
Color: 8.7 SRM
Boil Time: 90 Min

84% American 2-Row
7.6% Corn Sugar (Dextrose)
4.7% Carapils
3.5% Crystal 40 Malt
.9% Crystal 120 Malt

2 Oz Belma (11.3% AA) First Wort Hop
1.25 Oz Belma (11.3% AA) at 20 min
1 Oz Belma (11.3% AA) at 15 min
1 Tbsp Irish Moss at 15 min
1 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at 10 min
1 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 5 min
2 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at Whirlpool (165 deg)
2 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at Whirlpool (165 deg)
2 Oz Belma (11.3% AA) at Whirlpool (165 deg)
1.5 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at 5 Day Dry Hop
1.5 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 5 Day Dry Hop
1.5 Oz Chinook (13.1% AA) at 5 Day Dry Hop
1.5 Oz CTZ (8.26% AA) at 5 Day Dry Hop

Pitched onto a washed yeast WLP 023 Burton Ale Yeast Cake

Mash:

60 minutes at 152 F (Saccharification Rest)
10 minutes at 165 F (Mash Out)

Collected 6 gallons of wort in carboy.

Timber Ridge IIPA ingredients

Rich’s Pale Ale 2.0

April 22, 2013 at 7:09 pm

This is my second iteration of my Pale Ale recipe (version 1 can be found here).  For the most part I kept the grain bill the same, a mix of American 2-Row with some Vienna for color and maltiness.  I did however modify both the type of and amount of Crystal Malts in the grist.  I swapped out the C-120 for C-80 in the second version and also upped the overall percentage of crystal malts to 6.4% of the total grist vs. 4.% in version 1.  As I discussed in my tasting notes for my original recipe (tasting notes) the first version was slightly more hop forward, so I’m hoping the slight increase in the Crystal malts will work to make the second version a bit more balanced.

The main area that I focused on re-working for the second version was the hop profile.  I was fortunate enough to get my hands on 1 lb packages of Amarillo and Simcoe, two of the more popular hops, and wanted to incorporate them into my Pale Ale as they are known to work amazingly together. I used a backloaded hop schedule of 60, 20, 5, and 0 minutes to capture the the classic American citrus hop flavors associated with these hops. I also added some Chinook at flame out in an effort to introduce some pine and fruity notes to give the beer multiple layers of hop aromas.

I decided to do a split batch fermentation as I am planning on brewing this beer for my wedding and still in full out experimentation mode.  I decided to use Safale 05 for its clean fermentation for one batch. This traditional yeast choice for an American Pale Ale should serve as a good contrast to the second batch, which I decided to ferment with White Labs Burton Ale strain.  For this batch I am hoping the fruity notes from this strain will provide a nice interplay with the fruity/citrus hop aromas and contribute to the overall malt flavors in it.

I will be looking to see how the different yeast strains effect the perceived hop flavors as well as bitterness. Since I would up brewing 11 gallons I am also planning on dry hopping a small amount of the second version with some coffee beans in addition to the Amarillo/Simcoe/Chinook additions.  Stay tuned for tasting notes on  all three versions of Rich’s Pale Ale 2.0.

Rich’s Pale Ale 2.0

Batch Size: 12 Gallons

Original Gravity: 1.064
Est. Final Gravity: 1.016
ABV: 6.3%
IBU: 42.3
Color: 8.7 SRM
Boil Time: 90 Min

75.3% American 2-Row
18.3% Vienna Malt
4.1% Crystal 80 Malt
2.3% Crystal 40 Malt

1.25 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at 60 min
1 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at 20 min
1 Oz Simcoe (12.20% AA) at 20 min
1 Tbsp Irish Moss at 15 min
1 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at 5 min
1 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 5 min
1 Oz Chinook  (13.1% AA) at 0 min
1 Oz Amarillo (9.8% AA) at 7 Day Dry Hop
1 Oz Simcoe (12.2% AA) at 7 Day Dry Hop
1 Oz Chinook  (13.1% AA) at 7 Day Dry Hop

Split Batch Fermentation

6 Gallon: 3.2 L Starter of White Labs 023 Burton Ale Yeast
5 Gallon: 1 Pack Safale 05

Mash:

60 minutes at 152 F (Saccharification Rest)
10 minutes at 165 F (Mash Out)

Ferment at ambient air temperature of 62 F

Notes:

Lost 1 gallon to hop matter.

Due to a mis-configuration in Beer Smith I pulled more wort than I should have, thus the 90 minute boil.  A 60 minute boil would be appropriate for this beer and I will use one for future batches.

 

Pale Ale Ingredients

Update: Make sure that you use a blow off tube when using WLP 023 Burton Ale Yeast!!

photo (2)

West Coast Wheat

March 17, 2013 at 7:42 pm

India Pale Ale is one style that has experienced a renaissance among American Craft brewers, with the momentum clearly excelerating as the number of variations continues to grow. The transformation of the traditional IPA began with the birth of the double IPA,  as in true American fashion, brewers began pushing the limits by brewing stronger, hoppier, and bolder IPA’s. Recently new IPA variations have emerged including the Black IPA, Belgian IPA, and Rye IPA as brewers strive to meet the American consumers love affair with the almighty hop.

One lesser known IPA variation, the Wheat IPA, happens to be one of my favorites even though few commercial examples exist, the most popular probably being Anaheuser-Busch’s Shock Top. My preference for wheat IPA’s stems from the wheat’s contribution to the malt profile of the beer and in my opinion, the superior balance that it provides with the traditional citrus hop IPA flavors. The West Coast recipe below is the third iteration, one that I feel strikes the best balance of the three, while still allowing for a delicious interplay of wheat and citrus flavors.

I am satisfied the grain bill has achieved a balance of wheat and sweetness that can stand up against the 60 IBU contributed from the hops, however I am planning on modifying the hop bill this year.  While I love Falconers Flight, the fact that it is a proprietary blend of several hop varieties of unknown proportions has led me to reconsider its use in the recipe.  Moving forward I plan to eliminate it completely from the hop bill and experiment with different ratios of Simcoe, Amarillo, and Belma hops in order to allow for better duplicity moving forward.  Don’t get me wrong the recipe is great as it currently stands, so good in fact that if I was every able to open a brewery of my own this would be one of my flagship beers.  This makes the use of Falconers Flight potentially problematic, thus my reasoning for seeking out the alternative hop combinations.

West Coast Wheat

Batch Size: 11.5 Gallons
Original Gravity: 1.057
Final Gravity: 1.014
ABV: 5.7%
IBU: 59.1
Color: 6.2 SRM
Boil Time: 60 Min

52.2% American 2-Row
32.6% Wheat Malt
9.8% Munich Malt
2.2% Crystal 15

1.25 Oz Magnum(14% AA) at 60 min
1 Tbsp Irish Moss at 15 min
1.4 Oz Falconers Flight (10.5% AA) at 15 min
.75 Oz Summit (17% AA) at 15 min
1 Oz Citra (13.4% AA) at 5 min
2.6 Oz Falconers Flight (10.5% AA) at 1 min
2 Oz Citra (13.4% AA) at 1 min
1 Oz Summit (17% AA) at 0 min
4 Oz Falconers Flight (10.5% AA) Dry Hop (7 Days)

2 Packs Safale American Ale US-05 Dry Yeast

Mash at 15 for 60 minutes raise to 168 for a 10 minute mashout.

For detailed tasting notes of this West Coast Wheat recipe, click here.
WCW_Hops

DIY: Hop Screen Build

December 20, 2012 at 8:33 pm

One of my favorite parts about homebrewing aside from actually brewing and drinking the beer, is to constantly refine my brewing techniques and brewday process.  Over the past several years my brewing process has evolved from extract to all grain, mash tun cooler to direct fire mash, bottling to kegging.  You get the idea.  My process has become increasingly complex, yet with experience my brewdays have actually become more efficient than ever, and my beers continue to be quite tasty.

The initial additions to one’s brewing process can yield exponentially positive results to the finished beer. For example the transition from extract to all grain opens up a whole new flavor pallet to the brewer, and in turn can lead to more complex layered flavor profiles.  The addition of a stir plate to ensure proper yeast pitching rates and a clean and successful fermentations is another example.  Over time however, you run out of significant additions to the brewing process that provide the true “bang for your buck.”  This doesn’t mean the tinkering ceases, it just means that the results of the changes become much more subtle, yet they remain just as important to the finished product.

Every year I try to make at least one addition to my process, this year my most significant addition was the addition of a stainless steel hop screen.  One challenge many homebrewers face is how to handle hops in the brewing process.  There addition leads to extensive hop trub in the kettle that can be problematic to the post boil process.  Adding hops directly to the kettle can clog your pump or add significant volume to your primary fermentation if they go through unabated.  Adding hops in hopsacks is said to reduce hop utilization rates and can be quite the pain in the ass with multiple hop additions.  The addition of a hop blocker or false bottom can be a solution if leaf hops are used exclusively.

After researching all my options I finally decided to bite the bullet (and cost) and create a stainless steel hop screen that would allow me to leave all hops, pellet or whole leaf, in my kettle and not my fermenters where they belong.  Below you will find detailed instructions on how I built mine in addition to the specific parts numbers from McMaster Carr incase you would like to build one of your own.

McMaster-Carr part numbers:

1 Pack 97525A410 18-8 SS Blind Rivet w. 18-8  SS Manderl, Domed 1/8″ Diameter, .032″-.062″ thick
1 Pack 90183A311 Blind Rivet Flat Washer, 18-8 SS, Round for 1/8″ Body Rivet
1 Each 85385T519 Corrosion-resistant 304 SS Woven Cloth 30×30 mesh, .012 diameter 36×36 in sheet
1 Each SS 9″ x 2″ Round Cake and Pastry Ring

Step 1:

Cut the SS mesh sheet down to 30.25″ by 23.5″.  This assumes an additional two inches on the circumference which creates a nice seam for the rivets down the side of the hop screen.  I made my hop screen to stand high out of the kettle, you may consider making yours slightly smaller if you like to keep a lid on your kettle to promote faster boils or full boils in cold weather.

Step 2:

With the remaining mesh screen cut a 12″ to 13″ circle to create the bottom of the hop screen.  I used a large dinner plate as a template in my build.

Step 3:

Gently bend the mesh screen into the shape of a cylinder leaving a two inch overlap.  I used a set of clamps to hold my screen in place.  This is also a good time to make sure the baking ring fits around the circumference of the screen.  Next use a 1/8″ drill bit to make starter holes for the rivets approximately 2″ apart down the entire length of the seem.  Next secure the starter holes with the SS rivets and the blind washers.  I initially tried this without the washers but the rivet would not hold the screen, the washers are essential in order for the fasten to hold.

Step 4:

Take the circle SS mesh screen and make several small cuts along the edges (6-8 total).  This will allow the screen to mold better to the outside of the cylinder as you begin to rivet it together.  I wrapped the bottom of my screen around the outside of the main cylinder as best I could and again started with the 1/8″ drill bit to create the starter holes followed by a rivet and washer.  I put a ton of rivets on the bottom of my screen (roughly a half inch apart, I figured why skimp when I bought a box of 100 rivets).

Step 5:

Place the cooking ring on top of the cylinder, I left mine about a half inch higher than the SS mesh as it was kind of sharp and had some SS threads hanging off that could cut my hands.  This creates a smooth top decreasing the likely hood of cutting your arms if you have to reach into the screen for any reason during a brewday.

Final Thoughts:

At the time I thought I might have been crazy to spend nearly a 100 dollars on a hop screen, but I have to say after a year of use and no aggravation it was some of the best money I have ever spent.  The hop screen has succeeded my expectations as I have loaded it up with upwards of a pound of hops and it worked great.  No noticeable hop particles get through the mesh screen, while it also allows the wort inside the cylinder to come to a rolling boil increasing the hop utilization rates.  Overall I love the addition of the hop screen to my brewing process, and the only regret I had was not building one earlier.

Rich’s Pale Ale Tasting Notes

June 7, 2012 at 12:29 am

Appearance: Burnt orange to light brown with a quickly dissipating white head.

Smell: Subdued citrus hop aroma, slight carmel notes.

Taste: Moderate maltiness, Classic American hop profile finishes bitter with residual sweetness on the palate.

Mouthfeel: Moderately carbonated, Semi sweet with the balance focused more towards the hop bitterness

Drinkability & Notes: Overall an enjoyable beer, finished lighter than what I would have wanted and slightly hoppier. Next time I would increase the amount of crystal malt slightly to give it a fuller flavor profile while decreasing the late addition of Summit hops to strike a better balance.